Groupings
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, Isabel1130
-
- Posts: 794
- Joined: Sat Dec 18, 2010 9:22 pm
- Location: Cookeville, TN
Distance for " three gun bullseye " is 50 yards slow fire, and 25 yard timed & rapid fire.
Your targets don't tell me much, except I think the second from the top seems to have the best grouping (no flyers). but that could be due to better technique , better gun, better ammo. It's hard to say.
I do think you will get better intel, by shooting at a longer distance though.
At least 25 yds., or even better, 50 yds.
The problem is that top notch target pistols with top notch ammo, are capable of shooting one inch groups at 50 yards (from a Ransom rest).
So, anytime you are NOT getting that kind of accuracy, it is pretty tough to tell you why from here.
Your targets don't tell me much, except I think the second from the top seems to have the best grouping (no flyers). but that could be due to better technique , better gun, better ammo. It's hard to say.
I do think you will get better intel, by shooting at a longer distance though.
At least 25 yds., or even better, 50 yds.
The problem is that top notch target pistols with top notch ammo, are capable of shooting one inch groups at 50 yards (from a Ransom rest).
So, anytime you are NOT getting that kind of accuracy, it is pretty tough to tell you why from here.
Just shot a few off to see whats what. The top target was a High Standard Supermatic, second target High Standard "The Victor" and 3rd and 4 target S&W 41. Would like to try at 25 yards but don't have the space here. Thanks Ron
izzyjim wrote:Distance for " three gun bullseye " is 50 yards slow fire, and 25 yard timed & rapid fire.
Your targets don't tell me much, except I think the second from the top seems to have the best grouping (no flyers). but that could be due to better technique , better gun, better ammo. It's hard to say.
I do think you will get better intel, by shooting at a longer distance though.
At least 25 yds., or even better, 50 yds.
The problem is that top notch target pistols with top notch ammo, are capable of shooting one inch groups at 50 yards (from a Ransom rest).
So, anytime you are NOT getting that kind of accuracy, it is pretty tough to tell you why from here.
- lakesidemn
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:36 am
- Location: Minnesota
I have a S&W 41, among a few others, but it is interesting how targets 3 & 4 are so different. It almost looks like you had a different point of aim for each target. I would do them again. Once you get to the 25yd range, you should get a sub-1" groups at 25yds with the 41 and it will hold the X-ring at 50yds.
I think the third target is upside down. Still doesn't explain but better. Will try and spin to correct. Ron
lakesidemn wrote:I have a S&W 41, among a few others, but it is interesting how targets 3 & 4 are so different. It almost looks like you had a different point of aim for each target. I would do them again. Once you get to the 25yd range, you should get a sub-1" groups at 25yds with the 41 and it will hold the X-ring at 50yds.
Last edited by darticus on Thu Apr 17, 2014 7:10 am, edited 1 time in total.
Small world. My first real target gun was a model 41. Then I found a nice Hi. Std. Trophy w/7" barrel. I put an ultra dot scope on it, and used it for some years. It was more accurate & reliable than the 41.
Then I found a late model (1980's) HI. Std. Victor. didn't like it , sold it.
Then the gem. A pristine Victor, in the box with 2 mags. It was more accurate then the Trophy, or the 41, and very pretty.
I never could bring myself to have it drilled for scope mounts, so it still sits in the box. Shot occasionally, but not in competition because it has no scope, and my eyes are too poor for open sights at 25/50 yds.
Recently I got a HS Field king. The cheapest model HS. made in those days. I don't know why, but it is the most accurate of the .22's I own.
The Field king will sit in the safe, except for being oiled, or handled, because my Dad bought it when it was new, and I still remember watching him shoot it.
Then I found a late model (1980's) HI. Std. Victor. didn't like it , sold it.
Then the gem. A pristine Victor, in the box with 2 mags. It was more accurate then the Trophy, or the 41, and very pretty.
I never could bring myself to have it drilled for scope mounts, so it still sits in the box. Shot occasionally, but not in competition because it has no scope, and my eyes are too poor for open sights at 25/50 yds.
Recently I got a HS Field king. The cheapest model HS. made in those days. I don't know why, but it is the most accurate of the .22's I own.
The Field king will sit in the safe, except for being oiled, or handled, because my Dad bought it when it was new, and I still remember watching him shoot it.
- lakesidemn
- Posts: 30
- Joined: Wed Sep 19, 2012 10:36 am
- Location: Minnesota
darticus wrote:I think the third target is upside down. Still doesn't explain but better. Will try and spin to correct. Ron
lakesidemn wrote:I have a S&W 41, among a few others, but it is interesting how targets 3 & 4 are so different. It almost looks like you had a different point of aim for each target. I would do them again. Once you get to the 25yd range, you should get a sub-1" groups at 25yds with the 41 and it will hold the X-ring at 50yds.
That makes sense, so at least the groups are in the right place. Nice looking 41. I have similar grips from Nill.
Your groups are tight, so it is just a matter of sight adjustment. When getting ready for bullseye though, remember to adjust your sights with free hand shooting and not from a bag. Group location off a bag will not be the same location as one-handed bullseye shooting. I watched a bullseye video from a HM shooter and he stressed free hand testing, which makes sense now that I tried it - "call the shot"!
As far as sight adjustment goes, I (and some of the better shooters I play with) will pull the stacked targets off the face at the end of a match so we can see the group placement of 90 shots. We then make any necessary adjustments and are ready for the next match.
This technique is much more fool-proof than trying to chase your shots during a match. Of course, if there is a gross error make an immediate change.
This technique is much more fool-proof than trying to chase your shots during a match. Of course, if there is a gross error make an immediate change.
- john bickar
- Posts: 618
- Joined: Wed May 05, 2004 3:58 am
- Location: Corner of Walk & Don't Walk
Set your sights to whatever range you are shooting. Change the range, change the sights.darticus wrote:Thanks for the input. I wonder is it good to set sites to a close setup like 10 meters? Would it be better to set for longer distance. Thanks Ron
Keep a shooting diary and you will know how much to move them to get you reasonably centered and then fine tune from there with your sighting shots.
No sighters in Bullseye.DLS wrote:.....
Keep a shooting diary and you will know how much to move them to get you reasonably centered and then fine tune from there with your sighting shots.
Certified Safety Instructor: Rifle & Pistol
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~ Ben Franklin
They that give up essential liberty to obtain a little temporary safety deserve neither liberty nor safety.
~ Ben Franklin
-
- Posts: 105
- Joined: Sun Mar 20, 2011 1:34 pm
- Location: Elkhart, IN