Throw a tantrum or sing the blues?
Posted: Fri Apr 09, 2010 9:10 am
Currently, that seems to be the choices I have.
For this latest block of 10 matches in my bullseye league I decided to set aside the Pardini .22 and take up my M9 Beretta National Match pistol.
The idea was to prepare for the President's and National Trophy matches at Camp Perry this summer. I had not fired the Beretta since 2008, and that was the first time I had ever fired it. It was during the President's and NTI matches at Perry, because I'd recieved the pistol the day before the matches.
Last season I averaged 521-8X with the Pardini after having been away from bullseye since the summer of 2008.
So far, my highest score with the Beretta is a 377-1X. Wednesday night I turned in a dismal 263-0X. I do not seem to be improving. Out of six matches so far, I think I only have two targets, both slow fire, in which I manage to put every bullet into a scoring ring of some sort.
I cannot shake the feeling I might be doing better with an M1911 instead.
This weekend I'm going to compare group sizes from the M9 to some one-handed groups from my Colt Special Combat Government Model. It has been tightened and tuned and is the closest thing I have to a "hardball" gun in .45.
The outcome my decide if I buy a dedicated M1911 hardball gun...
For this latest block of 10 matches in my bullseye league I decided to set aside the Pardini .22 and take up my M9 Beretta National Match pistol.
The idea was to prepare for the President's and National Trophy matches at Camp Perry this summer. I had not fired the Beretta since 2008, and that was the first time I had ever fired it. It was during the President's and NTI matches at Perry, because I'd recieved the pistol the day before the matches.
Last season I averaged 521-8X with the Pardini after having been away from bullseye since the summer of 2008.
So far, my highest score with the Beretta is a 377-1X. Wednesday night I turned in a dismal 263-0X. I do not seem to be improving. Out of six matches so far, I think I only have two targets, both slow fire, in which I manage to put every bullet into a scoring ring of some sort.
I cannot shake the feeling I might be doing better with an M1911 instead.
This weekend I'm going to compare group sizes from the M9 to some one-handed groups from my Colt Special Combat Government Model. It has been tightened and tuned and is the closest thing I have to a "hardball" gun in .45.
The outcome my decide if I buy a dedicated M1911 hardball gun...