Page 1 of 1
Hämmerli 106 vs. Toz 35
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 2:44 pm
by diopter
If could buy one either of these used, in about the same condition, which would you chose, and why?
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 4:19 pm
by Cricman
TOZ. Grips. Parts?
cricman
Posted: Tue Oct 02, 2007 10:51 pm
by 6string
These two are very different, more so than meets the eye. First, the TOZ uses a striker in the falling block which is released by its own sear powered by an easily replaced coil spring. This makes for a very fast lock time.
The Hammerli uses an internal hammer,powered by an expensive/difficult to locate leaf spring, that swings up and hits a passive firing pin in the falling block.
The TOZ has a lower bore line, which gives a more straight back recoil. The Hammerli bore line is higher and closer to the sight line, thus canting is less of an issue. I have not found the recoil in the Hammerli problematic, even in the old model 100 with tapered octagonal barrel. I really like both!
However, I turned down a Hammerli because of parts and service expenses. When something goes wrong it will cost you a fortune. You can easily pay as much as the cost of the pistol to cover something like a faulty set trigger or damaged sear.
The TOZ parts are not a big problem.