Comments on first pistol reasoning
Posted: Sun Jul 15, 2007 8:48 pm
I'm window shopping for my first air pistol, having recently joined a club. Some clear criteria have developed and I'd appreciate feedback on my reasoning.
As a new shooter, I expect that for at least the next couple of years most any target pistol in good condition will out-shoot me. So my wife and bank account should be able to relax, because something less expensive than 'the best' will be quite satisfactory for a good while.
Also, as a general rule, I figure that a beginner at anything is best served by equipment that is simple and robust, so that one concentrates on developing good technique without being dazzled by a myriad of customisations and adjustments.
I don't want to waste money buying something that has accumulated cautionary tales about reliability, or that has become so historic that parts aren't easily available. That discounts the lower cost items I've seen for sale.
I've got a personal aesthetic which feels less comfortable relying on third parties to keep training or competing, so despite the age of the technology I lean towards the self-containment of spring-piston or pneumatic pistols.
I haven't noticed any CO2 pistols locally, and refilling with CO2 seems to be a lot of trouble compared to using the club scuba tank.
My own club seems to be dominated by Feinwerkbau and Morini, with some Steyr and Rohm. The club pistols available for training are FWB 65s, which I understand last forever and can be excellent value.
I have locally available a FWB 100 in near-new condition. One credible source has told me that the FWB 100 was 'the best of the pneumatics'. I've also read that FWB generally have a reputation for reliability and an excellent trigger.
For comparison, the asking price is about 40% of the local new price of a FWB 103 or Morini CM162EI. This seems to make it a good quality item near the top of my affordable range... so I should confidently proceed to stalk and knee-cap any other potential buyers.
Does this sound sensible? (Apart from the knee-capping...)
As a new shooter, I expect that for at least the next couple of years most any target pistol in good condition will out-shoot me. So my wife and bank account should be able to relax, because something less expensive than 'the best' will be quite satisfactory for a good while.
Also, as a general rule, I figure that a beginner at anything is best served by equipment that is simple and robust, so that one concentrates on developing good technique without being dazzled by a myriad of customisations and adjustments.
I don't want to waste money buying something that has accumulated cautionary tales about reliability, or that has become so historic that parts aren't easily available. That discounts the lower cost items I've seen for sale.
I've got a personal aesthetic which feels less comfortable relying on third parties to keep training or competing, so despite the age of the technology I lean towards the self-containment of spring-piston or pneumatic pistols.
I haven't noticed any CO2 pistols locally, and refilling with CO2 seems to be a lot of trouble compared to using the club scuba tank.
My own club seems to be dominated by Feinwerkbau and Morini, with some Steyr and Rohm. The club pistols available for training are FWB 65s, which I understand last forever and can be excellent value.
I have locally available a FWB 100 in near-new condition. One credible source has told me that the FWB 100 was 'the best of the pneumatics'. I've also read that FWB generally have a reputation for reliability and an excellent trigger.
For comparison, the asking price is about 40% of the local new price of a FWB 103 or Morini CM162EI. This seems to make it a good quality item near the top of my affordable range... so I should confidently proceed to stalk and knee-cap any other potential buyers.
Does this sound sensible? (Apart from the knee-capping...)