There is a long thread regarding if you should change your sights or not to increase your scoring. Sadly the thread is to long for most people to read and I wanted to recommend a article from the late Mr Don Nygord that has helped me alot regarding if I should change my sights or not.
Hopefully this help some people that are afraid of adjusting the sights during competition.
You can find the article here: http://nygord-precision.com/note_0402.htm
I hope you enjoy the reading.
So THAT'S why there are screws on my rear sight!
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
An excellent article!
Mr. Nygord enumerates a number of reasons why sight settings might need to be changed, including wind, optical effects and shooter fatigue.
Please note that Mr. Nygord does not advocate chasing shots: "One does not want to 'chase' each shot, but rather consider the center of the group." He goes on to discuss his definition of a 'group' -- i.e., a cluster of shots that are close enough together to fit within a circle that is the size of the shooter's hold area. This attempts to take into account randomness produced by the limited accuracy of the shooter, gun and ammunition when deciding whether or not the center of a shot group is 'significantly' displaced, so that a sight adjustment is required.
Unfortunately, it fails in this attempt. A shooter's accuracy isn't just defined by the size of his hold area, but also includes other effects, including his skill at operating the trigger. In Mr. Nygord's case, he was a good enough shooter that his hold area was undoubtedly the dominant factor in limiting has accuracy. So, his approach worked for him. For those of us who aren't blessed with Mr. Nygord's level of skill, it won't work so well.
Of course, Don Nygord may also have been defining 'hold area' as the size of the circle that covers 95 percent of your shots, when you shoot a lot of shots over a long period of time. If so, then his approach has greater validity, although it still doesn't account for random 'clumping' of shots.
I agree with you that the thread in question is quite long. So, for a discussion of how to account for shooter accuracy using such concepts as confidence intervals, please see my post:
http://www.targettalk.org/viewtopic.php?p=73352#73352
Although the concept itself is somewhat complex, the calculations use elementary school math. Of course, nobody goes to the range with a calculator. But, on the other hand, it helps to have a realistic understanding of your accuracy when assessing whether or not to change your sights.
I believe that this is what Don Nygord was saying in his article.
Regards,
Al B.
Mr. Nygord enumerates a number of reasons why sight settings might need to be changed, including wind, optical effects and shooter fatigue.
Please note that Mr. Nygord does not advocate chasing shots: "One does not want to 'chase' each shot, but rather consider the center of the group." He goes on to discuss his definition of a 'group' -- i.e., a cluster of shots that are close enough together to fit within a circle that is the size of the shooter's hold area. This attempts to take into account randomness produced by the limited accuracy of the shooter, gun and ammunition when deciding whether or not the center of a shot group is 'significantly' displaced, so that a sight adjustment is required.
Unfortunately, it fails in this attempt. A shooter's accuracy isn't just defined by the size of his hold area, but also includes other effects, including his skill at operating the trigger. In Mr. Nygord's case, he was a good enough shooter that his hold area was undoubtedly the dominant factor in limiting has accuracy. So, his approach worked for him. For those of us who aren't blessed with Mr. Nygord's level of skill, it won't work so well.
Of course, Don Nygord may also have been defining 'hold area' as the size of the circle that covers 95 percent of your shots, when you shoot a lot of shots over a long period of time. If so, then his approach has greater validity, although it still doesn't account for random 'clumping' of shots.
I agree with you that the thread in question is quite long. So, for a discussion of how to account for shooter accuracy using such concepts as confidence intervals, please see my post:
http://www.targettalk.org/viewtopic.php?p=73352#73352
Although the concept itself is somewhat complex, the calculations use elementary school math. Of course, nobody goes to the range with a calculator. But, on the other hand, it helps to have a realistic understanding of your accuracy when assessing whether or not to change your sights.
I believe that this is what Don Nygord was saying in his article.
Regards,
Al B.
-
2650 Plus
Why is a screwdriver in my pistol box
I made a post about sight changes but did not consider free pistol experience. I often had difficulties determining sight changes with my Hammerli. The fifty meter target is so difficult thet very minor errors almost always cause a loss of points. Nevertheless three shots left of center was enough . Get out the screwdriver and center the group. Good Shooting Bill Horton
-
2650 Plus
Sight adjustments
It finally dawned on me as to why we seemed to be disagreeing on sight adjustments. Some of use were talking about group size and others about centering the group. Communicating this way is harder than it appears. Good Shooting, Bill Horton