Posted: Tue Jun 06, 2006 3:49 pm
Mark, from what you describe I take it that it would be visibly obvious that the gun has malfunctioned and therefore, under rule 8.8.4.4, the RO does not even have to handle the pistol. The shooter would therefore be free to safely clear the gun. Explaining what is being done to the RO and enabling him to see any rounds taken out of the gun should keep everyone happy.Mark Briggs wrote:I suspect that an official seeing this would be able to call it as an allowable malfunction without too much trouble. The only real question is whether or not they would allow disassembly (4 screws) with this round still in the gun.
This makes me think what would happen in the case of a second, and therefore non-allowable, malfunction.
In a "normal" gun there would be a tendancy for the shooter to have a few choice words under his breath and then just clear the gun. Claiming a malfunction would be pointless. Where there is a more complicated procedure required to make the gun safe it would be polite to make sure that the RO knows what is going on. The safest way would be to claim the malfunction even though you know it would be non-allowable. It would at least be an appreciated "heads-up" for the RO.
This is one of those many variations which cannot all be covered by the wording in the rules. Common sense must prevail.