Posted: Sat Oct 14, 2006 3:50 am
Tycho! Here in Scandinavia Sako parts are still available, but I understand it's been a problem for years elsewhere in the world. Its beefy rubberbuffer I think is much better than the tiny nylon piece on some other pistols.
To the .38 vs .32 the differences in precision dident help me at all. Some years ago I tested my S&W M14-3 Masterpiece (with a Morini grip) for CF (only training). I feel the balance was ok (extra barrel weight), the trigger really crisp, but after some month with results more bad than with my .32 I just gave it up. I could shoot good series (47 and up for me) and next........... maybe 42-43 ! Of course it’s me and not the gun. It’s just easier for me to shoot consistent and good with a .32. With the .38 I also had to use more shots to get about right on the target, on my .32 (and .22) it's just 1-3 click up/down-left/right and I am right there (usually).
Regards Tor Ingvaldsen
To the .38 vs .32 the differences in precision dident help me at all. Some years ago I tested my S&W M14-3 Masterpiece (with a Morini grip) for CF (only training). I feel the balance was ok (extra barrel weight), the trigger really crisp, but after some month with results more bad than with my .32 I just gave it up. I could shoot good series (47 and up for me) and next........... maybe 42-43 ! Of course it’s me and not the gun. It’s just easier for me to shoot consistent and good with a .32. With the .38 I also had to use more shots to get about right on the target, on my .32 (and .22) it's just 1-3 click up/down-left/right and I am right there (usually).
Regards Tor Ingvaldsen