I have a purchased a Scatt WS1 and have been having some decent practice sessions in. I was wondering if anyone can provide goal stats for the parameters it tracks particularly the “10.0” “mm/s” and “mm/s/250mm”?
Another question I have, is there a reason why my “shot” falls outside of my trace lines?
Scatt Statistics Goals
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
-
- Posts: 214
- Joined: Sat Feb 08, 2014 2:16 pm
- Location: England
Re: Scatt Statistics Goals
The reason why it looks like it is not on your trace is because of the cunning mathematics it uses to predict how your shot would have landed due to your movement flinging the projectile off track after it left the barrel. Turn your F coefficient to zero and it will land right on the on the end of your blue line trace (trigger pull). Those movement stats in the last two seconds and in the last 0.25 of a sec are for you to log and keep an eye on and to see how it goes up or down as you do stuff, you want to get them as low as poss. Health warning though you are alive so you will have a base tremor that you will have to fight against, I've seen the stats of some great world class athletes and on those stats I'm as good as them and sometimes better BUT boy do they get the aiming and release better than me!!!!
Re: Scatt Statistics Goals
Thirdwheel, I'm using a Scatt MX W2 & MacBook Pro, I certainly get lower scores on the Scatt versus shooting on paper, and I think Scatt penalises poor follow through, so the shot appears further along the trace line.
Is this what you are describing?
I cannot find how to turn the F coefficient to zero - any pointers would be gratefully received!
Is this what you are describing?
I cannot find how to turn the F coefficient to zero - any pointers would be gratefully received!
-
- Posts: 16
- Joined: Wed Mar 06, 2024 4:28 pm
Re: Scatt Statistics Goals
If you're still a relative beginner, I would not get too hung up on achieving particular stat goals. I say this, because I think I've developed some bad habits as a beginner (which I still am) trying to chase some of those goals on my SCATT (particularly trace speed numbers). If more experienced people disagree, please let me know.
That being said, I've done some research on this, at least for elite shooters. This article (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8769313/) collected stats on someone who competed in the 2020 European Championships, who has also shot at least a 580 in competition.
Relative 9 hold (9a0 (%)) - 99.64
Relative 10 hold (10a0 (%)) - 82.74
Relative 10.5 hold (10.5a0 (%)) - 35.93
Trace speed 1s (mm/s) - 108.83
Trace speed 0.25s (appx trigger press) (mm/s) - 108.5
Absolute 10.0 hold (%) - 60.22
Absolute 10.5 hold (%) - 19.87
DA (mm) - 6.62
DA250 (mm) - 4.88
You could also look at some examples on scattdb.com for data on previous generation world-class shooters. It is mindboggling that they can maintain that kind of focus for 60 shots. (Whenever I've accidentally achieved the kind of trace speed numbers that they maintain throughout an entire match, it feels like the pistol is dead still and I'm in some sort of twilight zone.) However, there are a few whose numbers are relatively achievable (Marina Logvinenko is one example).
That being said, I've done some research on this, at least for elite shooters. This article (https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC8769313/) collected stats on someone who competed in the 2020 European Championships, who has also shot at least a 580 in competition.
Relative 9 hold (9a0 (%)) - 99.64
Relative 10 hold (10a0 (%)) - 82.74
Relative 10.5 hold (10.5a0 (%)) - 35.93
Trace speed 1s (mm/s) - 108.83
Trace speed 0.25s (appx trigger press) (mm/s) - 108.5
Absolute 10.0 hold (%) - 60.22
Absolute 10.5 hold (%) - 19.87
DA (mm) - 6.62
DA250 (mm) - 4.88
You could also look at some examples on scattdb.com for data on previous generation world-class shooters. It is mindboggling that they can maintain that kind of focus for 60 shots. (Whenever I've accidentally achieved the kind of trace speed numbers that they maintain throughout an entire match, it feels like the pistol is dead still and I'm in some sort of twilight zone.) However, there are a few whose numbers are relatively achievable (Marina Logvinenko is one example).