Now THAT'S accurate!

A place to discuss non-discipline specific items, such as mental training, ammo needs, and issues regarding ISSF, USAS, and NRA

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Post Reply
Rover
Posts: 7055
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Rover »

" Despite the enclosed target showing 3-rounds in about 5/8ths of an inch at one hundred yards, the rifle had not been chambered."

This, for you guys with the hots for your test targets.
Top
User avatar
Deigeh Nisht
Posts: 54
Joined: Sat Mar 24, 2012 8:02 pm
Location: Virginia

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Deigeh Nisht »

"Irregardless, it don't matter."
Top
Erud
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:50 pm

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Erud »

What is this in reference to?
Top
Rover
Posts: 7055
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Rover »

It appears the test target was a fraud. Not the first one, either.
Top
dc.fireman
Posts: 229
Joined: Wed Feb 29, 2012 10:02 pm

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by dc.fireman »

lol.

Now that IS interesting...
Top
Erud
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:50 pm

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Erud »

Rover wrote:It appears the test target was a fraud. Not the first one, either.
Yes, but which target, from which rifle, from which manufacturer? Your post doesn't seem to contain a link, or any additional info on where I could find out what you are actually talking about. Just a line in quotations with no citation. Is it an inside joke?
Top
Rover
Posts: 7055
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Rover »

I'm not pointing fingers here, so yes it is a joke (if it weren't true, and the second time I've heard of such a thing).
Top
Erud
Posts: 146
Joined: Fri Feb 04, 2011 11:50 pm

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by Erud »

Rover wrote:I'm not pointing fingers here, so yes it is a joke (if it weren't true, and the second time I've heard of such a thing).
So you're quoting someone, but won't tell who it is, or what they're talking about? Super helpful...
Top
User avatar
nglitz
Posts: 182
Joined: Sun Mar 07, 2004 10:48 am
Location: Hamilton Square NJ

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by nglitz »

Accuracy vs. precision:

Image

Most "gunnies" get it wrong. Group size is precision. Closest to the aim point, i.e. score, is accuracy.
Norm
in beautiful, gun friendly New Jersey
Top
User avatar
crankythunder
Posts: 255
Joined: Tue Dec 22, 2009 6:57 pm
Location: The ugly side of Hell, Michigan
Contact:
Contact crankythunder

Re: Now THAT'S accurate!

Post by crankythunder »

nglitz wrote:Accuracy vs. precision:

Image

Most "gunnies" get it wrong. Group size is precision. Closest to the aim point, i.e. score, is accuracy.

Dear nglitz:


nice pictograph.

Regards,
Cranky
Top
Post Reply

Return to “Shooters Lounge”