Hydrotesting "Expired" PCP Cylinders?

If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true

Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H

Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Post Reply
Gwhite
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Hydrotesting "Expired" PCP Cylinders?

Post by Gwhite »

Given the recent rules change about shooting with out of date cylinders, I was wondering if anyone is going to get set up to hydrotest & re-certify cylinders.

If you have an older air pistol (like a Hammerli 480K), you can't get new cylinders. Even if you could find "new" ones, the expiration date is based on when they were made, not when they were put in service. Your only option is to replace the entire air pistol, which is an incredible waste. I would think getting your cylinders tested & re-certified would be a very good sideline for someone.

One issue is the exact wording of the rules. If they go exclusively on the manufacturing date, a change to the rules would be required to allow re-certification.

Just a thought...
Rover
Posts: 7055
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Post by Rover »

An excellent idea!

A better one would be to get rid of the stupid rule!
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

See rule 6.7.7.1 d
Gwhite
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Gwhite »

Rule 6.2.4.2 seems pretty benign:

"It is the athlete’s responsibility that any air or CO2 cylinder is still within its validity date. This must be checked by Equipment Control."

However, Rule 6.7.7.1 d is a total crock:

"It is the athlete’s responsibility that any air or CO2 cylinder is within manufacturer’s validity date (maximum of ten (10) years); this may be checked by Equipment Control and advisory recommendations may be given;"

This is especially bogus considering that many older cylinders are clearly marked by the manufacturer as being good for 20 years.

The bottom line is that the rules would have to be changed to allow re-certification.

If someone is competing at the Olympic level with the latest equipment, this is probably just a minor annoyance. However, it means that many beginners who don't have deep pockets will be stuck. It also gets into liability issues. If you are running a junior program on a limited budget, you pretty much have to work with 2nd hand gear. If there is no way to re-certify older cylinders, you have to decide if the risk of an accident is low enough to continue to use "out of date" equipment.
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

Gwhite wrote:If there is no way to re-certify older cylinders, you have to decide if the risk of an accident is low enough to continue to use "out of date" equipment.
As has always been the case.
Gwhite
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Gwhite »

True, but because PCP's are a relatively "recent" invention, the issue is becoming more critical now. Early PCP cylinders with a 20 year expiration are about to fall off the "cliff" in the near future, if they haven't already.

CO2 guns are in the same boat, although because they operate at 1/3rd the pressure, the risk should be much lower.
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

Gwhite wrote:True, but because PCP's are a relatively "recent" invention, the issue is becoming more critical now. Early PCP cylinders with a 20 year expiration are about to fall off the "cliff" in the near future, if they haven't already.
Sorry, I got the impression (obviously wrongly) that you were implying this was an effect of the new ISSF rules.

As I read them, and I could of course be wrong, if your cylinder is over 10 years old you may be given "advisory recommendations".

Hardly something to get worked up about IMHO.
Gwhite
Posts: 3427
Joined: Sat Sep 04, 2004 6:04 pm
Location: Massachusetts

Post by Gwhite »

It's really two issues. One is: what happens if you show up at an ISSF match with an expired cylinder? The other is: what will be the impact on beginning shooters & programs when used equipment is no longer legally deemed "safe"?

Both could be alleviated by the existence of an affordable re-certification process for cylinders.
Rover
Posts: 7055
Joined: Sat Nov 15, 2008 4:20 pm
Location: Idaho panhandle

Post by Rover »

I had heard (on this forum) that some shooters were refused entry to some European matches.

I'm not aware of this happening in the US, but it may only be due to my ignorance.
David Levene
Posts: 5617
Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
Location: Ruislip, UK

Post by David Levene »

Rover wrote:I had heard (on this forum) that some shooters were refused entry to some European matches.
I believe that would probably have been in Germany, due to local regulations not ISSF rules.
Post Reply