Bullet Selecttion - Swaged vs Cast
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, Isabel1130
Bullet Selecttion - Swaged vs Cast
I am relatively new to bullseye competition. I competed in 2700 matches last year shooting my Model 41 for all the events. I've purchased a Dave Salyer wadgun, Dillon 550, and in the process of buying components. Is there a difference between swaged and cast bullets as far as leading? I'm trying to decide between buying from Zero (swaged) and Magnus (cast) and would appreciate your comments. I'm looking at shooting a 200 gr. SWC for both shot and long line events. Thanks
Tom
Tom
-
- Posts: 344
- Joined: Fri Apr 15, 2005 1:50 pm
- Location: Tennessee
Swaged or cast
Tom-if used at target velocities most lead bullets won't cause leading.I have used both brands and they are accurate. I might say the swaged bullets are SLIGHTLY more accurate possibly due to the tighter weight variations and possibly -being softer-faster obturation characteristics.I consider a 200gr/45 cal slug easier to obtain excellent accuracy at 50 yds probably because minor imperfections in the bullet have less effect on a heavier bullet over a lighter weight bullet.The H&G #68 shaped heads seem to produce a good compromise between reliable functioning and accuracy. You can't do better than a Dave Salyer built pistol. IMO....of course
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Spence don't worry about the dies. I load with Dillon seat and crimp dies for lead bullets mostly for the take apart and clean feature. And I find they make just as good a round as my Redding or RCBS seat and crimpers. Actually my favorite crimper is the RCBS TC seater with the seat stem removed. That is what I use for jacketed bullets along with the Redding micrometre seater. Oh- and I modified the Dillon seat plug to push on the shoulder.
I have not loaded any recently though. The 45 is sort of retired for the winter. I put another 22 upper on the wad gun frame for the time being. I hope to make a match or two in Salem before the Portland Sectional. You?
I have not loaded any recently though. The 45 is sort of retired for the winter. I put another 22 upper on the wad gun frame for the time being. I hope to make a match or two in Salem before the Portland Sectional. You?
What Jack says is fine for either jacketed or hard cast
It took me a long time to find them but I use Hornady new dimension 454 Casull dies . They size the case OD to 0.469 IIRC. Std dies size to 465 or less as makers dont want loose bullet complaints from ordinary users. That includes the smallest bullet OD in the thickest case. Not a good deal for match accuracy.
Think about it; the wall thickness is 11 mil on Federal, 14 on Amercs (junk) and 8 on remington. Do the math; take case OD from above - 2x wall thickness gives what inside diameter? And you're gonna stuff a soft slug in that without deforming it? I dont think so.
My jouney here began when old timers said their Star presses left loose bullets with some cases but the accuracy was outstanding. I couldnt get good accuract with swaged or flat base bullets , only with bevel base hard cast. I sure do now ! RR groups 50 yard under 2" in a good gun.
enjoy !
It took me a long time to find them but I use Hornady new dimension 454 Casull dies . They size the case OD to 0.469 IIRC. Std dies size to 465 or less as makers dont want loose bullet complaints from ordinary users. That includes the smallest bullet OD in the thickest case. Not a good deal for match accuracy.
Think about it; the wall thickness is 11 mil on Federal, 14 on Amercs (junk) and 8 on remington. Do the math; take case OD from above - 2x wall thickness gives what inside diameter? And you're gonna stuff a soft slug in that without deforming it? I dont think so.
My jouney here began when old timers said their Star presses left loose bullets with some cases but the accuracy was outstanding. I couldnt get good accuract with swaged or flat base bullets , only with bevel base hard cast. I sure do now ! RR groups 50 yard under 2" in a good gun.
enjoy !
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
http://m.hornady.com/store/454-Casull-F ... ie-1-Each/
Bruce, is this what you are using?
I can see the reasons for using the sizing die, but is there any additional atvantages to replacing the other dies with the Hornady Casulls?
Bruce, is this what you are using?
I can see the reasons for using the sizing die, but is there any additional atvantages to replacing the other dies with the Hornady Casulls?
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Ahhh da 9's
Not sure if you saw my BE-List posting on it; I have a stock 92fs
It has a 0.357 groove 1 in 10 barrel. WTF ! It will technically stabilize a 180 gr bullet. Went thru a similar exercise with 124 gr lead, which leaded at any loading. Now load 0.358 diameter 158 RN with Unique. I get 960 fps and decent 25 yd and 50 ft accuracy.
The secret there is to use UNSIZED shells, specifically Federals as they are straight wall cases; others are tapered. A 45 die pokes out primers. The bullet seats with finger pressure and crimp holds it securely. (same thing works with 32 S&WL also from BE-list discussion). Tapered cases wont finger seat and crush the bullet base in if you use the press to do it.
Try it. ps there are published loads for 147 and 158 gr 9mm subsonics.
regards
Not sure if you saw my BE-List posting on it; I have a stock 92fs
It has a 0.357 groove 1 in 10 barrel. WTF ! It will technically stabilize a 180 gr bullet. Went thru a similar exercise with 124 gr lead, which leaded at any loading. Now load 0.358 diameter 158 RN with Unique. I get 960 fps and decent 25 yd and 50 ft accuracy.
The secret there is to use UNSIZED shells, specifically Federals as they are straight wall cases; others are tapered. A 45 die pokes out primers. The bullet seats with finger pressure and crimp holds it securely. (same thing works with 32 S&WL also from BE-list discussion). Tapered cases wont finger seat and crush the bullet base in if you use the press to do it.
Try it. ps there are published loads for 147 and 158 gr 9mm subsonics.
regards
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
Bruce, I have heard about the leading problems. I am thinking I may want to run nothing but jacketed bullets through the gun. Will plated bullets solve the leading issue?
What do you think of these for a potential short line load?
http://www.berrysmfg.com/product-i14476 ... gr_HP.aspx
I have been told to use the Hornady 115g XTP JHP for the long line. I have the slow twist rate KKM barrel in my Beretta, and will have the same in my 1911 9mm.
What do you think of these for a potential short line load?
http://www.berrysmfg.com/product-i14476 ... gr_HP.aspx
I have been told to use the Hornady 115g XTP JHP for the long line. I have the slow twist rate KKM barrel in my Beretta, and will have the same in my 1911 9mm.
I can't say about the KKM barrel and loads but I understand plated are seldom very accurate.
If you have a bullet under groove size, you will get leading
Everyone wants screamers out of a 9 and I don't think it is necessary.
Measure the groove and get the right size bullet
I gotta bug Jeffie to try it too
regards
If you have a bullet under groove size, you will get leading
Everyone wants screamers out of a 9 and I don't think it is necessary.
Measure the groove and get the right size bullet
I gotta bug Jeffie to try it too
regards
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
I understand what you are saying oldcaster, but I consider 11 or 12 cents a bullet to be kind of pricy for the short line. I use the 160g Valiants for the short line and indoors, for my 45 and those are abut six cents a piece.
I already have 3600 Hornadays and Zeros for the long line, and I am only looking fir 25 yard accuracy with the Berrys.
If I can't get the accuracy I want at 25 yards, I will just stick with the Zeros for the short line. I think they were just a tad over 100 bucks for a thousand.
I don't like to shoot FMJ in a bullseye match. The ragged holes confuse a lot of people, and if a master class shooter is not scoring me, I find I have to call for a plug more often than I would like. It shifts my focus away from my shooting.
I already have 3600 Hornadays and Zeros for the long line, and I am only looking fir 25 yard accuracy with the Berrys.
If I can't get the accuracy I want at 25 yards, I will just stick with the Zeros for the short line. I think they were just a tad over 100 bucks for a thousand.
I don't like to shoot FMJ in a bullseye match. The ragged holes confuse a lot of people, and if a master class shooter is not scoring me, I find I have to call for a plug more often than I would like. It shifts my focus away from my shooting.
I agree that poor bullet holes can be a problem just like you said, but I don't think you will get decent 25 yard groups from the Berrys. If you do have decent results let us know because perhaps, they have improved in the last few years.
6 cents a bullet for anything that can be used at even 25 yards is a good deal because I think, by the time, I run around getting lead and sometimes adding tin + lube, they may cost at least close to that much for me to mold not mentioning time which I guess I now have plenty of.
The biggest reason I even cast is because my 45 cast bullets at 50 yards are the most accurate thing I can come up with but only by a small margin but 38's are quite a bit more accurate. I only shoot 60 45s a week now since I quit indoors so that is only about 3000 45s and 1500 38s not counting matches or random practices in the summer.
I have a 92FS that is completely accurized and want to try to see if I can get a lead bullet to shoot accurately at 50 yards so I don't have to buy jacketed. After a year and a half messing with the 32 and finally being successful at 50, I have some ideas that might work out in the 9mm. I spent a little time shooting a Saeco 115 SWC and it shows promise but with a few bad flyers. We'll see. -- Bill --
6 cents a bullet for anything that can be used at even 25 yards is a good deal because I think, by the time, I run around getting lead and sometimes adding tin + lube, they may cost at least close to that much for me to mold not mentioning time which I guess I now have plenty of.
The biggest reason I even cast is because my 45 cast bullets at 50 yards are the most accurate thing I can come up with but only by a small margin but 38's are quite a bit more accurate. I only shoot 60 45s a week now since I quit indoors so that is only about 3000 45s and 1500 38s not counting matches or random practices in the summer.
I have a 92FS that is completely accurized and want to try to see if I can get a lead bullet to shoot accurately at 50 yards so I don't have to buy jacketed. After a year and a half messing with the 32 and finally being successful at 50, I have some ideas that might work out in the 9mm. I spent a little time shooting a Saeco 115 SWC and it shows promise but with a few bad flyers. We'll see. -- Bill --