A place to discuss non-discipline specific items, such as mental training, ammo needs, and issues regarding ISSF, USAS, and NRA
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Moderators: pilkguns , m1963 , David Levene , Spencer , Richard H
Richard H
Posts: 2654 Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Contact:
Post
by Richard H » Thu Aug 09, 2012 12:29 pm
It's been an interesting discussion.
Eric U
Posts: 140 Joined: Sun Feb 06, 2011 6:40 pm
Post
by Eric U » Thu Aug 09, 2012 4:35 pm
The argument that track goes to zero for finals doesn't apply to shooting because in track they run exactly the same event over again. At least in rifle and pistol it would be equivalent to running a marathon for qualification and a 100m sprint for a final.
Eric U
peterz
Posts: 355 Joined: Sat Dec 05, 2009 11:31 am
Location: Great Falls, VA
Post
by peterz » Thu Aug 09, 2012 5:22 pm
Eric,
The argument still applies, but it isn't conclusive. I do see your point. And I am not suggesting that the proposed change is a good one.
pete
Richard H
Posts: 2654 Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 11:55 am
Location: Guelph, Ontario
Contact:
Post
by Richard H » Thu Aug 09, 2012 7:23 pm
Plus thats based on the assumption that they won't change qualifications too.
ruig
Posts: 361 Joined: Wed Mar 03, 2004 2:35 pm
Post
by ruig » Fri Aug 10, 2012 12:38 pm
Leon
Posts: 834 Joined: Mon Jul 07, 2008 4:04 am
Location: Sydney, Australia
Post
by Leon » Sat Aug 11, 2012 4:06 am
Interesting to see that he used Russian ammo - which he describes as being superior to anything being made now.
Dave IRL
Posts: 195 Joined: Mon Oct 26, 2009 10:25 am
Post
by Dave IRL » Sat Aug 11, 2012 6:45 am
Leon wrote:
Interesting to see that he used Russian ammo - which he describes as being superior to anything being made now.
To be fair, I think he's in the position to make that determination!