CLUB GUNS
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
CLUB GUNS
Our club is considering replacing our existing .22's, which include for the most part Ruger Mk II's and S&W 41's.
We've been looking at several models (with a budget in mind) including Ruger Mk III's, GSG 1911's, and Walther T22's.
Does any one have any comments on the quality of the above?
Alternatives?
Thanks
We've been looking at several models (with a budget in mind) including Ruger Mk III's, GSG 1911's, and Walther T22's.
Does any one have any comments on the quality of the above?
Alternatives?
Thanks
You might want to post this in the Bullseye section, since those are primarily Bullseye-styled guns (more so than Olympic style, anyway), and I don't think the Bullseye guys check the lounge postings that much. I don't have much experience with any other than the Ruger to be able to offer any worthwhile input myself, but do wonder why you would replace Mark II's with Mark III's. There are enough aftermarket parts to replace anything that has worn out on the Mark II, and I think it's a better gun than the Mark III. Even if, for the sake of argument, the Mark II wasn't better, the Mark III is certainly no better than the II, so you'd be spending a lot of money for nothing more than shiner and brighter versions of what you already have. Just my two cents.
Thanks,
Ted
Thanks,
Ted
I'm with tedbell on this.
I'm still using my thirty+ year old M41 and it has only been to the factory once for a rebuild. It didn't cost much, and if you have a fairly late one it's free (including shipping). I think this is a far better/nicer gun than the Ruger, but the Rugers aren't crap either.
You cannot wear out the barrels, so a few odd parts and springs and your current guns will be better than new. My M41 is as accurate as my Free Pistol. Just yesterday I shot a 897-61X (out of a possible 900-90) over the Police L course with it.
If you're not happy with their performance, you might want to invest in better grips, testing ammo, and working on the sights, as well as trigger jobs on the Rugers. You won't be upgrading by buying new MkIII Rugers or the others you mentioned.
I'm still using my thirty+ year old M41 and it has only been to the factory once for a rebuild. It didn't cost much, and if you have a fairly late one it's free (including shipping). I think this is a far better/nicer gun than the Ruger, but the Rugers aren't crap either.
You cannot wear out the barrels, so a few odd parts and springs and your current guns will be better than new. My M41 is as accurate as my Free Pistol. Just yesterday I shot a 897-61X (out of a possible 900-90) over the Police L course with it.
If you're not happy with their performance, you might want to invest in better grips, testing ammo, and working on the sights, as well as trigger jobs on the Rugers. You won't be upgrading by buying new MkIII Rugers or the others you mentioned.
-
- Posts: 357
- Joined: Sat Feb 05, 2005 11:59 pm
- Location: Ottawa, Canada
I would strongly suggest you look at the Browning Buckmark, our club replaced its Ruger MK I, with MKIII and while they have held reasonablly well, they are a pain to clean in a club enviroment.
The 1911 GSG liley would not hold up in our club. Used Walther GSPs might be another option.
Brian in Ottawa
The 1911 GSG liley would not hold up in our club. Used Walther GSPs might be another option.
Brian in Ottawa
CLUB GUNS
An update since I posted this query:
Our club purchased a GSG .22 and a S&W Model 22A to try out.
The GSG is working fine. The frame on the 22A cracked after 500 rounds or so.
Needless to say we're still evaluating our options.
And yes, I'd love to get some 208's for that price!
Our club purchased a GSG .22 and a S&W Model 22A to try out.
The GSG is working fine. The frame on the 22A cracked after 500 rounds or so.
Needless to say we're still evaluating our options.
And yes, I'd love to get some 208's for that price!