Skanåker back in the business?
Moderators: pilkguns, m1963, David Levene, Spencer, Richard H
Forum rules
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
If you wish to make a donation to this forum's operation , it would be greatly appreciated.
https://www.paypal.com/paypalme/targettalk?yours=true
Skanåker back in the business?
Interesting article in today's Swedish news:
http://www.aftonbladet.se/55/article6457301.ab
This states that Ragnar Skanåker wants to take over the Swedish National pistol team as coach. He claims that the current team is in shambles and needs proper leadership. At almost 76 years old, he says he's the man for the job.
I wonder how this will play out. He was last the Swedish National champion at age 73. That's a pretty long career already.
The Google Translator does a respectable job translating this, by the way.
http://www.aftonbladet.se/55/article6457301.ab
This states that Ragnar Skanåker wants to take over the Swedish National pistol team as coach. He claims that the current team is in shambles and needs proper leadership. At almost 76 years old, he says he's the man for the job.
I wonder how this will play out. He was last the Swedish National champion at age 73. That's a pretty long career already.
The Google Translator does a respectable job translating this, by the way.
He may be the man for the job but that depends on a) his coaching xperience and b) without sounding funny, how long he can cope with doing the job. I personally would be looking for someone younger who can develope the team over the next 10 years or so. At 76 he's unlikely to be able to do that.
Rob.
Rob.
He may be the man for the job but that depends on a) his coaching xperience and b) without sounding funny, how long he can cope with doing the job. I personally would be looking for someone younger who can develope the team over the next 10 years or so. At 76 he's unlikely to be able to do that.
It's stupid opinions like this that threatens the health of this sport
Might be a natural reaction but you could have sad that 10 years ago and now he is still going strong. Do not forget that he will certainly draw attention to our sport from the media, a most welcome public interest!RobStubbs wrote:He may be the man for the job but that depends on a) his coaching xperience and b) without sounding funny, how long he can cope with doing the job. I personally would be looking for someone younger who can develope the team over the next 10 years or so. At 76 he's unlikely to be able to do that.Rob.
Kent
Really, which part of my sensible suggestion is 'stupid' pray tell ? I would turn your own statement around and ask you how that non-constructive verbage helps us move forwards ?, I did at least explain my thought processes.RB6 wrote:He may be the man for the job but that depends on a) his coaching xperience and b) without sounding funny, how long he can cope with doing the job. I personally would be looking for someone younger who can develope the team over the next 10 years or so. At 76 he's unlikely to be able to do that.
It's stupid opinions like this that threatens the health of this sport
He could certainly have a role in shooter development. Such as team management or the like, something to keep the media interest going, and to be honest he could do that for rifle and pistol. Like I said what coaching experience has he got to take on such a role though ? I've seen him shoot and I've seen him selling his hat with glasses on.Reinhamre wrote:Might be a natural reaction but you could have sad that 10 years ago and now he is still going strong. Do not forget that he will certainly draw attention to our sport from the media, a most welcome public interest!RobStubbs wrote:He may be the man for the job but that depends on a) his coaching xperience and b) without sounding funny, how long he can cope with doing the job. I personally would be looking for someone younger who can develope the team over the next 10 years or so. At 76 he's unlikely to be able to do that.Rob.
Kent
Rob.
Yeah, I know, BUT, media is like flees on a lump of sugar.RobStubbs wrote: I've seen him shoot and I've seen him selling his hat with glasses on.
Rob.
National championship in free pistol final 2009 was sent by national tv broadcast, live! Let us use the flow :-) Besides, do we have an alternative? That is the big question.
Kent
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
- Freepistol
- Posts: 773
- Joined: Sun Feb 10, 2008 5:52 pm
- Location: Berwick, PA
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
It was amusing watching the final on the web-cam; he was sitting down between shots.
OK it might have been to "rest his weary bones", but I doubt it. More likely it was just because he could.
The first time I saw Ragnar shoot (1981) I was amazed to see that he would leave the firing point between series and go and have a chat with the crowd.
After shooting against him many times I realized that he was a master at being able to mentally switch in and out of match mode at will; just like flicking a switch. A valuable skill at a level that not many have.
OK it might have been to "rest his weary bones", but I doubt it. More likely it was just because he could.
The first time I saw Ragnar shoot (1981) I was amazed to see that he would leave the firing point between series and go and have a chat with the crowd.
After shooting against him many times I realized that he was a master at being able to mentally switch in and out of match mode at will; just like flicking a switch. A valuable skill at a level that not many have.
Post Subject
I would rather be coached by Ragnar. Others might be able to help also, but this would be getting the information from the " Horses Mouth " so to speak. This also followes my therey that the world level shooters understand our sport better than most coaches and have important information to relate that cannot be gained from lesser mortals. If you set your goal to set a new world record I believe you must improve your technique until it is better than what has gone before. I am convinced that the shooter must become a student of what others have proven and deelope from there. Good Shooting Bill Horton
Re: Post Subject
A philosophy you've stated before Bill, but one that I very much disagree with. You can be a very good learner, a very good shooter and a rubbish coach. How many times have you seen a very good worker get promoted to management and be shown to be absolutely rubbish ? The very same applies as shooting and teaching (coaching) are very different skills.2650 Plus wrote:I would rather be coached by Ragnar. Others might be able to help also, but this would be getting the information from the " Horses Mouth " so to speak. This also followes my therey that the world level shooters understand our sport better than most coaches and have important information to relate that cannot be gained from lesser mortals. If you set your goal to set a new world record I believe you must improve your technique until it is better than what has gone before. I am convinced that the shooter must become a student of what others have proven and deelope from there. Good Shooting Bill Horton
Rob.
I also remember him doing this in the early 90s, usually with his Hammerli 152 still in his hand!David Levene wrote:The first time I saw Ragnar shoot (1981) I was amazed to see that he would leave the firing point between series and go and have a chat with the crowd.
"Those were different days" as they say, range safety has evolved since then thank god.
-
- Posts: 1364
- Joined: Mon Jan 28, 2008 7:19 pm
- Location: Wyoming
One of the advantages I see in having a coach that either is or has been a world class shooter like Skanaker is that in a sport with such a huge mental component especially at the world class level, without those bonafides, how do you convince your shooter that they can do what you have been unable to do? How do you chart a course for them to get to the highest level if you have never been there yourself? I am not saying that they are not a lot of average shooters who are very good at imparting the physical and technical skiills of shooting on to their students. I just believe that coaching someone to be world class level is an entirely different game and expecting someone who has not competed at the highest level and succeeded to develop world class shooters is asking too much of both the coach and the shooters. Not every world class shooter is going to automatically be a great coach. Not every club level shooter is going to be a terrible coach, but based on the amount of mis information some of the so called experts try to give me on the line I will give more weight and credibility to what a World class shooter or former World class shooter is telling me. Isabel
-
- Posts: 5617
- Joined: Mon Mar 01, 2004 12:49 pm
- Location: Ruislip, UK
You wouldn't need to.Isabel1130 wrote:One of the advantages I see in having a coach that either is or has been a world class shooter like Skanaker is that in a sport with such a huge mental component especially at the world class level, without those bonafides, how do you convince your shooter that they can do what you have been unable to do?
In the modern game at world class level a coach is the figurehead for a team of specialists; sports psychologists, nutritionalists, biomechanicians, conditioning coaches, etc.